Hypnosis and Sugar Addiction
It is four in the afternoon. The day isn't over, your concentration drops, and you are already on your feet before you decided anything.
Or it's the evening: the meal is finished, you are not hungry, and yet something isn't closed until you have eaten something sweet.
You have tried stopping before. It holds three days, a week, sometimes longer. And then one tired evening it all goes, and the night ends in a mix of relief and reproach.
This page offers no withdrawal, no food list and no sugar-elimination programme. It sets out why the craving always comes back at the same hour, what keeps the loop going, and what a session can realistically aim at: alongside medical care, never instead of it.
What it is like when sugar takes up too much room
Before you read.
This page offers no withdrawal, no food list and no sugar-elimination programme.
If you have eating binges, if you impose increasingly strict food rules on yourself, or if your doctor is following you for diabetes or another metabolic condition, the first step is a medical appointment.
Hypnosis comes alongside that, never instead of it.
The drawer, the coffee machine, the vending machine at the end of the corridor. The square of chocolate at nine in the evening. The next day, you start again, stricter.
What you are describing is one of the most common reasons people come to see us. And the first thing worth knowing is that it is not a matter of character: a craving that returns every day at the same hour obeys a mechanism, and a mechanism can be looked at closely.
Video transcript
Hello. Are you the type of person who can never finish a meal without a dessert? Who runs to the convenience store late at night because you're out of ice cream at home? Welcome to the reality of many people who describe themselves as sugar addicts. The truth is, it's not always a matter of willpower. Sometimes it's stronger than us. We eat our emotions such as stress, boredom, anxiety, and often what we choose isn't a stick of celery, it’s a piece of chocolate, a bag of candy, or a tub of ice cream.
And rest assured, you're not alone. Sugar acts on our brains like a real reward. It triggers dopamine, the famous pleasure hormone, and we keep coming back for more and more and more. But when a little pleasure or a little treat becomes a routine or a compulsion, that's when things get complicated. And that's where hypnosis comes in. Contrary to popular belief, you remain in full control during hypnosis. No one is going to make you cluck like a chicken.
It's more of a team effort between you and your hypnotherapist. You enter a state of deep relaxation, which allows you to communicate with your subconscious mind. That part of you that loves chocolate chip cookies. It's a moment of deep relaxation. Like when you're daydreaming, when you're immersed in a book you love or in a TV series. When you're gardening. When you're taking a walk in nature. Except that you take this opportunity to talk to your inner self.
Where automatic responses impulses and deep rooted habits are hidden. During an initial conversation, we begin by understanding your habits and emotional triggers. We help you identify what really drives you to sugar. And to create healthier, more conscious alternatives. We also work on motivation, self-confidence, and we help you reframe your relationship with food. For example, we help you manage stress in ways other than reaching for the ice cream tub.
The result ? Less guilt. More kindness towards yourself. Hypnosis doesn't do everything in just one session. It's not a magic wand, but it's a real boost, deep and lasting to help change your perspective. So if you're tired of fighting against yourself and if you want to regain a healthier relationship with sugar, hypnosis can be a real ally. A great ally. The solutions Hypnosis team is here to support you, whether in person, near you, or by video, which also works really well.
So make an appointment now to create the life you want with hypnosis. See you soon.
Hypnotherapy is a complementary form of support and does not replace medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. If you have any concerns about your health, please consult a physician first.
What is "sugar addiction"?
The phrase is everywhere. It describes a real experience made of urgency, difficulty stopping and the return of the craving, but it covers situations that are in fact very different, and worth telling apart.
Liking sweet things is ordinary and universal. Sweet taste is experienced as pleasant from the first hours of life: newborns can already tell degrees of sweetness apart, and premature babies suck harder when what they are given is sweet.
A conditioned habit is a craving that always turns up in the same situation: the coffee after a meal, the square of chocolate at nine, the mid-afternoon break. It is no longer the sugar calling, it is the context.
A compulsion goes further: an urgency to eat fast and a lot, sometimes in secret, with a sense of loss of control, and then shame.
Binge eating disorder is a recognised eating disorder, characterised by repeated binges without the compensatory behaviours of bulimia. It calls first for specialist medical care.
Is sugar really an addiction?
The honest answer is: the question is scientifically disputed, and the balance tips rather towards no.
A reference review published in the *European Journal of Nutrition* by a team at the University of Cambridge went through the animal and human data. Its conclusion is clear: the evidence supporting sugar addiction in humans is thin. The addiction-like behaviours seen in animals appear only in a context of intermittent access (rodents deprived of food for half the day), and not as an effect of sugar itself on the brain. Animals with permanent access to sugar do not develop them. The authors explicitly warn against a premature incorporation of "sugar addiction" into the scientific literature and public policy. The diagnostic manuals do not recognise it either.
This is not a theoretical detail, and it changes two very concrete things for you.
First, your cravings are real even if the label doesn't fit. Not being "dependent" in the clinical sense has never made a craving weaker at four in the afternoon.
Second, if the problem is not a substance, then the answer is not withdrawal. It is in fact the opposite: what triggers the behaviours closest to dependence, in the available data, is precisely intermittent access, the alternation between the ban and the breaking point. A site that sells you withdrawal is selling you the mechanism of the problem.
When to see a doctor.
Unusual thirst, marked fatigue, cravings for sweet things that appear abruptly where there were none, unexplained weight loss or gain: these deserve to be assessed.
Several medical conditions and several medications act on appetite and on the perception of sweetness.
Any decision about your treatment belongs solely to the doctor who prescribed it.
What the craving costs day to day
What weighs is often not the sugar itself: it is the room it ends up taking in your head. There is the constant negotiation: I'll have some, I won't, I already gave in yesterday. There is the hiding, the wrappers made to disappear, eating differently alone and in company. There is sleep, when late evenings stretch out around the cupboard. And there is the avoiding: the office birthday you dread, the dessert you refuse a little too firmly.
Why the craving always rises at the same hour
Four things come up almost every time, and none of them has to do with willpower.
The rhythm of your meals. A day started at a run, a lunch rushed or skipped, and the afternoon loads up. The body asks for what picks it up fastest.
Sleep. After too short a night, the pull of enjoyable food rises the next day, and people eat more without necessarily being hungrier. The hormonal explanations once put forward (a story about ghrelin and leptin) were not confirmed by the work that followed: what changes seems to have more to do with the pleasure sought than with a hunger signal. Sleep remains worth looking at, and it often isn't.
Stress and mental fatigue. Sweet things have a real and immediate comforting effect. That is not an illusion: it is exactly what makes them such an available solution when the day has been rough.
The conditioned habit. Often the most powerful of the four. A repeated association between a situation and a gesture ends up triggering the gesture at the mere appearance of the situation. At that stage it is no longer a decision, it is a reflex, and a reflex cannot be reasoned with.
The recognised approaches, apart from hypnosis
The way in is your doctor. Only they can rule out a medical cause, look at a current treatment and point you onward.
- A dietitian or nutritionist, for anything to do with what you eat. That is their profession and their responsibility; it is not a hypnotherapist's, and we will give no advice of that kind.
- Psychotherapy, cognitive behavioural therapy in particular, whose contribution to eating behaviour is recognised by the health authorities.
- Work on sleep, often overlooked, sometimes decisive.
- Mindfulness approaches applied to eating, which are the subject of ongoing research.
- Associations and support groups, particularly where there are binges.
Hypnosis sits alongside these approaches, on the side of automatic habits and emotions.
What a hypnosis session can aim at
Let's start with what hypnosis does not do.
It does not make you find sugar disgusting, and that would be a bad idea: installing an aversion only shifts the balance of forces. It causes no withdrawal. It replaces neither medical nor nutritional follow-up. It does not put you to sleep and makes you do nothing against your will. And it guarantees no result.
What the work aims at:
- Reducing the urgency. So that a craving becomes a craving again, meaning something that rises, can be watched and comes back down, instead of an order you obey before you have thought about it.
- Uncoupling the situation from the gesture. Separating the hour, the place or the emotional state from the sweet reflex that attached itself to it, by the same learning mechanism that installed it.
- Handing to other resources what sugar came to do. Unwinding, marking the end of the day, rewarding yourself, filling a gap: as long as that job isn't taken up elsewhere, removing sugar leaves a hole nothing fills.
- Giving sweet things their proper place: a chosen pleasure, in a chosen situation, rather than an urgency endured and then regretted.
- Easing the judgement those repeated attempts have installed, and which feeds precisely the behaviours it reproaches.
The deeper work on emotional hunger and compulsions is set out on our main page: hypnosis for eating and weight.
The loop of the forbidden
This is the central mechanism of the subject, and it deserves to be seen whole.
You decide to stop sugar. The first few days, the decision holds and you feel rather good. Then the food you set aside becomes more present in your mind than before, because forbidding it concentrates attention rather than extinguishing it. The craving rises, the difficult day arrives, and the helping becomes a frank one, because it has to be worth the transgression.
Then comes the guilt. Studies that follow people hour by hour in their daily lives show that unpleasant emotions rise before a binge more than at ordinary moments. They also show that the binge does not settle them: afterwards, the discomfort is stronger than before. That is what makes the loop so stubborn: not that it consoles, but that it leaves a little more material for the next turn each time. And the episode ends in a stricter rule, which sets up the next one.
This is not a character flaw. It is a loop, and it closes faster the more rigid the rule is. So the work goes the other way: nothing is forbidden, and that is precisely why nothing demands its revenge.
What about sweeteners?
The question comes up at every first conversation, and the answer has two parts.
On the nutritional side, the question belongs to your doctor or a dietitian. The health authorities reassess it regularly, and their advice has shifted again in recent years. It is neither our field nor our place to settle it.
On the behavioural side, we can say something useful, provided we stay with what we see in practice. Replacing a sweet product with its sweetened version does not touch the automatic habit itself: the gesture, the hour and the situation stay the same, and it is that trio that triggers. Sweet things remain the answer given to the end of the day. For some people that is a comfortable arrangement, and there is nothing wrong with it. For others, it is a way of keeping the loop intact while believing it has been solved.
When "I'm cutting out sugar" becomes a problem
A point of safety, because it is central here.
Deciding to remove a whole category of food is not a harmless step. Rigid rules, the ones that allow no exception, are among the factors most consistently associated with the onset of eating disorders in young people, and the risk rises with the severity of the rule. Researchers still debate whether restriction triggers the disorder or is an early sign of it; for you, the practical consequence is the same.
The list of foods set aside grows, the rules harden, eating out becomes complicated, and the attention paid to food takes up more and more of the day. Binges sometimes appear, often described as failures when they are the predictable answer to the restriction.
If you recognise yourself in this picture (food rules that keep multiplying, binges followed by shame, behaviours to compensate after eating, or a preoccupation that takes up a great deal of room), these deserve to be assessed by a doctor. You will find free and anonymous helplines at the foot of this page. Speaking about it early changes a great deal.
What the research says
Two pieces of work shed light here, and they say different things.
On sugar itself, the University of Cambridge review cited above concludes that the evidence for sugar addiction in humans is lacking, and ties the addiction-like behaviours seen in animals to intermittent access rather than to any action of sugar in its own right.
On hypnosis and eating behaviour, the French randomised trial HYPNODIET (AP-HP, Université Paris Cité), published in the *American Journal of Clinical Nutrition*, covered 82 adults being followed for obesity with high levels of eating disinhibition. After eight months, disinhibition had fallen further in those for whom sessions of Ericksonian hypnosis and self-hypnosis had been added to dietary support. It is a single trial, run in a precise setting with selected participants, and the current state of knowledge allows no definitive conclusions. The study was not about sugar.
The researchers are the first to warn. The professor who led the work notes that "many offerings are in fact false promises when patients are told they will lose a lot of weight by permanently ridding themselves of their cravings for sweet things". That is precisely what we do not offer.
Put side by side, these two readings point the same way: the lever is not the substance, it is the behaviour.
An example: Marc's case
*Name changed, published with his agreement.*
Marc arrived with a request phrased like a contract: "I want you to cut out my craving for sugar." He had held several weeks without it a few months earlier, and going back had been abrupt. The first conversation mostly brought out a rhythm: the cravings did not come at random, they gathered in the late afternoon, on the days he ran meetings back to back without a break, and on Sunday evenings.
The work went there, into what those two moments were asking for and what could give it to them otherwise, and not into the sugar, which was never forbidden. In his words: "The strangest part is that the chocolate stayed in the drawer. Some days I have some, others I don't, and I no longer make a whole story out of the difference."
This case describes one possible path. It predicts nobody else's. The pace and the results vary from one person to another, and no support can guarantee an outcome.
How a session on this subject unfolds
The first conversation. The rhythm of your cravings (what hour, what day, what state), your sleep, your medical context and your medications. We will also ask about any binges and about the food rules you set yourself: that is what lets us know whether we are the right resource, or whether another door should open first.
The objective. Worked out together, and never framed as elimination. It looks more like: get through the late afternoon without the question arising, or be able to leave half a portion.
The induction. A natural state of focused attention you already know. You stay conscious, you hear everything, you can speak and stop whenever you wish.
The work. On this subject it most often concerns separating a moment of the day from the gesture attached to it, the resources able to do the job sweet things were doing, and the way a craving is experienced, watching it rise and fall rather than fighting it.
The debrief and the exercise. A conversation about what you experienced, and a self-hypnosis exercise to take away, often aimed at the precise moment the craving appears. The essential part happens between sessions.
Book an appointment
The first conversation is there precisely to work out whether hypnosis is the right resource for your situation, and a clear answer (including "this isn't for you") is part of the work. Ask us a question or book an appointment. Our practitioners who work in English see people in Montreal, Sherbrooke, Gatineau, Paris and Lille, and by video wherever you are in the world. The number of sessions is worked out at the first conversation.
If your question is really about weight, we answer it plainly on the page about hypnosis for weight loss: hypnosis does not make you lose weight, it works on your relationship with food.
Where would you like to consult?
All areas
Annie Mayrand
Gatineau - Cumberland (ON)
👤
🧑🎓
🚭
❤️
💻
Christian Rocher
Beloeil
👤
🧑🎓
👶
🚭
❤️
💻
David Veilleux
Montréal - Anjou
👤
🧑🎓
🚭
❤️
🤰
💻
Florence Aton
Sutton
👤
🚭
❤️
💻
Jessica Reid
Sherbrooke
👤
🚭
💻
Julie Rocque
Montréal - Jean-Talon
👤
🧑🎓
👶
🚭
❤️
🤰
💻
Nuria Pérez de León
Montréal - Rosemont - Saint-Lambert
👤
🧑🎓
💻
Réjeanne LeBlanc
La Prairie
👤
🧑🎓
👶
💻
Frequently asked questions about Hypnosis and Sugar Addiction
The comparison gets around a lot, but the available human data do not support it, and the diagnostic manuals recognise no sugar addiction. That makes your cravings neither imaginary nor easy to get through: it only means the lever is not withdrawal.
No. The hypnotic state is a state of focused attention, not sleep and not being under anyone's influence. You stay conscious, you hear everything, and you keep at all times the ability to refuse a suggestion, to speak or to stop the session. A suggestion that clashed with your values would have no reason to be followed, and you would have no difficulty setting it aside.
Yes. Hypnosis is a non-drug approach that adds to your follow-up without interfering with it. Tell us what you take at the first conversation. Any decision about your treatment belongs solely to the doctor who prescribed it: we will never ask you to stop or change it, nor to alter anything in an eating plan set by a health professional.
Psychotherapy is a regulated framework, practised by professionals whose title is protected, and it can address the whole of psychological functioning and established disorders. Hypnosis as we practise it is a narrower kind of support, centred on a precise objective and on the automatic habits attached to it. The two often combine well.
No, and we will not ask you to. This work rests on no prohibition, for a precise reason: forbidding a food increases its pull and sets up the next breaking point. The aim is for sweet things to become a choice again, not to disappear.
On the nutritional side, that question belongs to your doctor or a dietitian. On the behavioural side, replacing a product with its sweetened version does not touch the reflex: same gesture, same hour, same situation. It can suit you, but it does not undo the habit.
Talk to a doctor first. Repeated binges with a sense of loss of control can point to binge eating disorder or another eating disorder, which call for specialist care. Free and anonymous helplines are listed at the foot of this page. Hypnosis can then support certain aspects, alongside the team following you.
That is a different question, and we answer it plainly on the page about hypnosis and weight loss. In short: hypnosis does not make you lose weight, it works on your relationship with food.
Sources and references
Helplines
- Quebec: ANEB, Anorexie et boulimie Québec: 1 800 630-0907 (or 514 630-0907), free and confidential, every day from 8 a.m. to midnight. Chat and text at the same number, Monday to Friday from noon to midnight, weekends from noon to 9 p.m.
- France: Anorexie Boulimie Info Écoute (Réseau TCA Francilien and FFAB): 09 69 325 900, no premium rate, anonymous, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday from 4 to 6 p.m., excluding public holidays.
- Quebec: In distress or having suicidal thoughts: 1 866 APPELLE (1 866 277-3553), text 535353, or chat at suicide.ca, 24/7.
- France: In distress or having suicidal thoughts: 3114, free and confidential, 24/7.
On eating disorders
- Boulimie et hyperphagie boulimique : comment en parler ?, Haute Autorité de santé, practical sheet, June 2019 (in French). It addresses in turn the person concerned, those close to them, and clinicians.
- Patton, G. C., Selzer, R., Coffey, C., Carlin, J. B., & Wolfe, R. (1999). *Onset of adolescent eating disorders: population based cohort study over 3 years*. BMJ, 318(7186), 765-768. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: "Dieting is the most important predictor of new eating disorders", with a risk that rises with the severity of the restriction. Study conducted in adolescent girls.
On sugar and on hypnosis
- Westwater, M. L., Fletcher, P. C., & Ziauddeen, H. (2016). *Sugar addiction: the state of the science*. European Journal of Nutrition, 55(Suppl 2), 55-69. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: "We find little evidence to support sugar addiction in humans", and addiction-like behaviours in animals "occur only in the context of intermittent access to sugar […] not the neurochemical effects of sugar".
- Vasiliu, O. (2022). *Current Status of Evidence for a New Diagnosis: Food Addiction — A Literature Review*. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 824936. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: "Food addiction is a controversial diagnosis which is not included in the current classificatory systems created by either American Psychiatric Association or World Health Organization."
- Mennella, J. A., Bobowski, N. K., & Reed, D. R. (2016). *The Development of Sweet Taste: From Biology to Hedonics*. Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 17(2), 171-178. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: "The sensory pleasantness derived from tasting something sweet is inborn. Within hours of birth, newborns can differentiate varying degrees of sweetness."
- Chaput, J.-P., & St-Onge, M.-P. (2014). *Increased Food Intake by Insufficient Sleep in Humans: Are We Jumping the Gun on the Hormonal Explanation?* Frontiers in Endocrinology, 5, 116. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: "sleep restriction is not associated with changes in ghrelin or leptin levels", and the excess intake appears "preferentially driven by hedonic rather than hormonal factors".
- L'hypnose : un « traitement » utile chez certaines personnes atteintes d'obésité, AP-HP press release on the HYPNODIET trial (in French), the source of the warning quoted above about "false promises".
Hypnosis as practised by the members of Solutions Hypnose is a complementary support approach. It is neither a medical act, nor a diagnosis, nor psychotherapy in the regulatory sense, and it in no way replaces a consultation, follow-up or treatment prescribed by a health professional.
Our practitioners do not assess and do not treat mental disorders or illnesses. They never ask for an ongoing treatment to be stopped or changed: that decision rests exclusively with your doctor.
No result can be guaranteed. The testimonials and examples presented on this page describe individual experiences and do not predict what you will experience.
In case of significant distress, unexplained physical symptoms or suicidal thoughts, contact a doctor, emergency services or a helpline without delay.
Page written by Nuria Pérez de León
hypnotherapist and NLP coach
partner at Solutions Hypnose.
English version reviewed by David Veilleux